Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 1763 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 192 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 105 vs 135 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen 9 3900X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Matisse | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 135 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
