Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700T outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700T is 1772 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Performs up to 5% better in Death Stranding than FX-6200 - 223 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-7700T - €42.6 vs €174.03
- Up to 74% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i7-7700T - €0.2 vs €0.78 per FPS
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €174.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700T | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |