Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i7-4810MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1319 days newer than Core i7-4810MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4810MQ
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 47 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 5 than Core i7-4810MQ - 202 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4810MQ - 16 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€180
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16429 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4810MQ | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |