Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i7-4700MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1536 days newer than Core i7-4700MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4700MQ
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 47 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-4700MQ - 201 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4700MQ - 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4700MQ | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |