Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i7-3940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1802 days newer than Core i7-3940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3940XM
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-3940XM - 255 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3940XM - 24 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
255
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3940XM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |