Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2515 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 6% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i7-3930K - 483 vs 456 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - €349.99 vs €546.05
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3930K - 24 vs 12 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Buy for €546.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74384 minutes ago
Buy for €349.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74385 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Single-Core
606
47.56671899529042%
Multi-Core
2961
39.72363831499866%
Intel Core i7-3930K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |