Buy on Amazon
€546.05
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3090 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 14% better in Remnant II than Core i7-3930K - 91 vs 80 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - €264.87 vs €546.05
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3930K - 20 vs 12 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7-3930K Prozessor (3,2GHz, 12MB-Cache, Sockel 2011)
Buy for €546.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74779 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-10900F (Basistakt: 2,80GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110900F
Buy for €264.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74779 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3930K
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3930K
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Single-Core
606
36.15751789976134%
Multi-Core
2961
35.141229527652506%
Intel Core i7-3930K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 12 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
