Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3610QM outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3610QM is 232 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3610QM
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G530 - 128 vs 126 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G530 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 8 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
126
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3610QM | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |