Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Core i7-3610QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1716 days newer than Core i7-3610QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3610QM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i7-3610QM - 76 vs 75 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-3610QM - 35 vs 45 Watts
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
76
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €20.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3610QM | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |