Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3610QM outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3610QM is 224 days older than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3610QM
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
1
100%
Value, €/FPS
€20.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3610QM | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |