Buy on Amazon
€20.16
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1620 outperforms the more expensive FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Celeron G1620 is 418 days newer than the more expensive FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 1% cheaper than FX-4100 - €20.16 vs €20.39
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Verwendeter 2-Kern-2-Thread-Desktop-Prozessor 2,7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
vhbw 2X Druckerpatronen Tintenpatronen Set kompatibel mit Samsung SF-4200, SF-4220, SF-4400, FX-4000, FX-4100 Ersatz für Samsung INK-M10, Lexmark 13400HC.
Buy for €20.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
