Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3220 is 365 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - €20.16 vs €25.06
- Up to 19% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-3220 - €0.17 vs €0.21 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 1% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G530 - 117 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Celeron G530 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 4 vs 2 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
116
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
Buy for €25.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |