Buy on Amazon
€25.06
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3220 is 327 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 13% better in Diablo IV than FX-4100 - 101 vs 89 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - €20.59 vs €25.06
- Up to 8% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i3-3220 - €0.23 vs €0.25 per FPS
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
CHYYAC Intel Core I3-3220 I3 3220 3,3 GHz Dual-Core-CPU-Prozessor 3M 55 W LGA 1155
Buy for €25.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
vhbw 2X Druckerpatronen Tintenpatronen Set kompatibel mit Samsung SF-4200, SF-4220, SF-4400, FX-4000, FX-4100 Ersatz für Samsung INK-M10, Lexmark 13400HC.
Buy for €20.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
