Buy on Amazon
€502.5
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Core i7-3520M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2515 days newer than Core i7-3520M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3520M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i7-3520M - 218 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3520M - 8 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
218
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€502.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
INTEL Core i7-9700F 8Core bis 4,7GHz ohne Prozessor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for €502.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-3520M
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3520M | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
