Buy on Amazon
€60.24
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Core i7-2960XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2403 days newer than Core i7-2960XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2960XM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 3% better in War Thunder than Core i7-2960XM - 138 vs 134 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i7-2960XM - 54 vs 55 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 3,1 GHz verwendet Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i7-2960XM
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2960XM | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
