Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2760QM outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-2760QM is 1458 days older than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2760QM
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 45 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
110
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2760QM | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |