Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i7-2635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2432 days newer than Core i7-2635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2635QM
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 46% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i7-2635QM - 104 vs 71 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2635QM - 16 vs 8 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
104
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€180.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €180.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2635QM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |