Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4053 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Celeron G1620 - 194 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 28 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - €20.16 vs €409.49
- Up to 95% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i7-14700F - €0.11 vs €2.11 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €409.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 401 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
189
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 401 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-14700F | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 2 |
28 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |