Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 3599 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 13% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-6200 - 144 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 20 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - €42.6 vs €276.0
- Up to 82% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-12700F - €0.34 vs €1.92 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €276 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16492 minutes ago
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16492 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700F | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 3 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |