Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 607 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-9100 - 219 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €84.88 vs €190.36
- Up to 55% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i7-10700F - €0.39 vs €0.87 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
44%
Price, €
€190.36
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for €190.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
217
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €84.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |