Buy on Amazon
€242.73
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8600K is 2047 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than FX-6200 - 123 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-8600K - €42.6 vs €242.73
- Up to 80% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-8600K - €0.39 vs €1.97 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Core i5-8600K Prozessor 3,6GHz (9 MB Cache, bis zu 4,30 GHz)
Buy for €242.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
LANCHY AMD FX-Serie FX-6200 CPU verwendet 6-Core 6-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,8 GHz 8M 125W Sockel AM3+
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-8600K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8600K | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 3 |
| 6 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
