Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i5-8305G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 154 days older than Core i5-8305G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8305G
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 0% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-8305G - 259 vs 258 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8305G - 16 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
259
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€180
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17934 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8305G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake G | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 2270 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon RX Vega M GL | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |