Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-6600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-6600K is 941 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 136% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G1620 - 52 vs 22 FPS
- Up to 18% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G1620 - €0.75 vs €0.92 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i5-6600K - €20.16 vs €39.0
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 55 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
52
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39
51%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
91 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |