Buy on Amazon
€42.6
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-6200 outperforms Core i5-540M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6200 is 781 days newer than Core i5-540M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-540M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 22 than Core i5-540M - 250 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-540M - 6 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-540M doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
FPS
250
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
LANCHY AMD FX-Serie FX-6200 CPU verwendet 6-Core 6-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,8 GHz 8M 125W Sockel AM3+
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-540M
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-540M | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Arrandale | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 3 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
