Buy on Amazon
€89.07
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690K outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4690K is 826 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 13% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-6200 - 111 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 88 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i5-4690K - €42.6 vs €89.07
- Up to 46% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-4690K - €0.43 vs €0.8 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 6 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core I5-4690K I5 4690K I5 4690K 3,5 GHz Quad-Core Quad-Thread 88W 6M CPU Prozessor LGA 1150
Buy for €89.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15412 minutes ago
LANCHY AMD FX-Serie FX-6200 CPU verwendet 6-Core 6-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,8 GHz 8M 125W Sockel AM3+
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15411 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-4690K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
88 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
