Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2221 days newer than Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 14% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-3330 - 125 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 24 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Buy for €309.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
555
43.563579277864996%
Multi-Core
1643
22.041856721223503%
Intel Core i5-3330 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |