Buy on Amazon
€40.13
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1823 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €40.13 vs €180.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing Stray than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.23 vs €0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Stray than Core i5-3330 - 182 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 16 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-3330
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
177
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.13
100%
Value Winner
CHYYAC Intel Core I5-3330 I5 3330 3,0 GHz Quad-Core CPU Prozessor 6M 77W LGA 1155
Buy for €40.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13351 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
23%
Price, €
€180
22%
FPS Winner
AMD RYZEN THREADRIPPER 1900X 4.0GH
Buy for €180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13352 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-3330
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
