Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 912 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 44% better in F1 23 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 277 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - €69.26 vs €129.76
- Up to 23% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i5-12400F - €0.36 vs €0.47 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
277
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
76%
Price, €
€129.76
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €129.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
193
69%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |