Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 294 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Minecraft than Core i3-10105F - 801 vs 713 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - €70.51 vs €133.25
- Up to 41% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-12400F - €0.1 vs €0.17 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
801
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
58%
Price, €
€133.25
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for €133.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10290 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
713
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€70.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €70.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10290 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |