Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 2317 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 114% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G3900 - 220 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - €51.75 vs €138.12
- Up to 21% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i5-12400F - €0.5 vs €0.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
220
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
79%
Price, €
€138.12
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €138.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
103
46%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |