Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2430 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4370.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Core i3-4370 - 286 vs 272 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €55.85 vs €170.08
- Up to 64% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-11600KF - €0.21 vs €0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
286
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
35%
Price, €
€170.08
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €170.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
272
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-4370 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |