Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2430 days newer than Core i3-4370.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Core i3-4370 - 285 vs 272 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 12 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
285
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€309.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €309.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35430 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1220
57.492931196983974%
Multi-Core
2407
29.39667806546165%
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |