Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8350 - 217 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €155.88 vs €210.73
- Up to 15% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-11600K - €0.82 vs €0.97 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
217
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
84%
Price, €
€210.73
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for €210.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |