Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-2600S - 369 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600S - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - €75.84 vs €101.9
- Up to 14% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-11400F - €0.24 vs €0.28 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
369
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
85%
Price, €
€101.9
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for €101.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4781 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
322
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€75.84
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €75.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4781 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i7-2600S |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |