Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3210 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 26% better in World of Warcraft than Core i5-3470S - 200 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470S - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - €64.13 vs €101.9
- Up to 22% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-11400F - €0.4 vs €0.51 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
78%
Price, €
€101.9
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for €101.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 918 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
159
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€64.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €64.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 917 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i5-3470S |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |