Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 2378 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 16% better in Battlefield V than FX-6200 - 238 vs 206 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i3-9100 - €42.6 vs €81.57
- Up to 38% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i3-9100 - €0.21 vs €0.34 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 6 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €81.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17831 minutes ago
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17830 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |