Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 765 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 10% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G3900 - 262 vs 239 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-8100 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
239
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |