Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-8100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-8100 is 35 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 172 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €47.0 vs €180.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.27 vs €1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 16 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
172
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€47
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17370 minutes ago
Buy for €180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17370 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |