Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the more expensive Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3468 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-540.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i3-540 - 149 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i3-540 - €74.07 vs €200.0
- Up to 64% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i3-540 - €0.5 vs €1.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-540 - 65 vs 73 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15276 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15277 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |