Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - €78.99 vs €120.06
- Up to 33% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i5-10400 - €0.34 vs €0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-4150 - 234 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
230
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €78.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16255 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
234
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
66%
Price, €
€120.06
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for €120.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16254 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |