Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 3170 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i3-13100F - €78.99 vs €124.14
- Up to 32% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i3-13100F - €0.15 vs €0.22 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-4150 - 564 vs 522 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
522
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €78.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17053 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
564
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
68%
Price, €
€124.14
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for €124.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17052 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |