Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 761 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - €77.99 vs €126.25
- Up to 38% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-6800K - €0.31 vs €0.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-4150 - 255 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 12 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
253
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Buy for €126.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |