Key Differences
In short — Core i3-390M outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-390M is 1057 days older than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 881 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Arrandale | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |