Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3101 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 19% better in Rust than Core i3-390M - 179 vs 150 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14067 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |