Buy on Amazon
€20.16
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1620 outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1620 is 1061 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Core i3-350M - 189 vs 188 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-350M doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Verwendeter 2-Kern-2-Thread-Desktop-Prozessor 2,7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-350M
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Arrandale | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
