Buy on Amazon
€20.16
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G530 outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G530 is 605 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Celeron G530 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Performs up to 4% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-350M - 223 vs 214 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-350M doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G530
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
223
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G530 CPU verwendet 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 2,4 GHz 2M 65W LGA1155
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-350M
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Celeron G530
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Arrandale | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
