Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2772 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-350M - 255 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-350M - 24 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
255
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Arrandale | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |