Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i3-3227U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1675 days newer than Core i3-3227U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 22% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-3227U - 210 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3227U - 24 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
210
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3227U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |