Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3220 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3220 is 454 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 1% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G1820 - 237 vs 235 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Celeron G1820 - €25.06 vs €35.49
- Up to 27% better value when playing Ready or Not than Celeron G1820 - €0.11 vs €0.15 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
237
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.06
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €25.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |