Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 781 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 1% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than FX-4100 - 110 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 43% cheaper than Celeron G1820 - €20.39 vs €35.49
- Up to 41% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron G1820 - €0.19 vs €0.32 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 294 minutes ago
Buy for €20.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 294 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |